The Journey to FHIR Standardization
My mother tried to explain to me early on that the world was gray, that there weren’t simple black or white choices. Even still today I have trouble accepting this at times, and it’s made life tough for me. But, it’s true. Digital is a lie. The digital world often oversimplifies the complexities of life. Life, at its core, is analog. Life is about playing in the gray, the murky muck.
FHIR’s journey, while rich with progress, is interspersed with persistent and newly arising areas of uncertainty, a testament to the standard’s expanding influence and the active engagement it inspires. These gray areas embody the complex challenges that we, as a collective of like-minded healthcare altruists, must address if FHIR is to be anything more than “just another standard.” FHIR was intended to be transformative. We’re at a point where it could be. But FHIR’s full potential has yet to be fully realized.
The path forward is mired in gray areas – complex challenges that require our collective attention and action. The inherent challenges of creating universal standards in a field as diverse as healthcare are daunting. Each patient encounter is unique, each provider’s needs are distinct, and each healthcare entity operates within its own complex ecosystem. FHIR’s role is to serve as a common language, but the dialects of this language are still being formed.
The Interplay of FHIR with Big Data, AI, Privacy, and Security
The integration of FHIR with today’s modern big data and AI ecosystems is poised to revolutionize healthcare, offering unprecedented insights into patient care and operational efficiency. However, this integration is not seamless. The rapid evolution of technology often outpaces the development of comprehensive standards, leading to a landscape where interoperability is still a work in progress. Moreover, the proliferation of digital data sharing heightens concerns around privacy and security, necessitating robust measures to protect patient information.
Historically, access to broad datasets consistent in scope and quality has been a challenge to leveraging the bleeding edge of the modern data stack. With the prospect of the normalized data that could be exposed via FHIR in the future (which, to be clear, is already starting to be exposed today) and the government-inspired frameworks to share FHIR data being put in place today, one can see how these data challenges begin to get easier.
The convergence of FHIR with big data and AI holds immense promise for transforming healthcare delivery. By standardizing data exchange, FHIR enables the aggregation and analysis of vast datasets, fueling algorithms that can predict patient outcomes, personalize treatments, and streamline operations. Yet, the gray areas persist. The more data we collect, the greater the potential risk to patient privacy. Ensuring the security of sensitive health information becomes increasingly complex as data flows across an expanding network of digital touchpoints. The rampant digital attacks on healthcare IT systems in recent months and years speak for themselves.
Given how regulated the protection of healthcare data is, you can see we’re about to jump into a giant puddle of gray murk. Questions persist:
- What data sharing rules and policies do organizations need to have in place?
- How is data lineage tracked, surfaced, and utilized?
- What data sharing nuance needs to be digitized?
- As data payloads get larger, effectively supporting “minimum use” in instances where it applies gets tougher. Which data use rights do you grant users in your organization?
- Who provides data governance-type support overall as this need expands?
- And so on…
Critical questions and issues. All policies and decisions that can be articulated today. Not a bad gray matters to start with.
The Economics of FHIR: Implications of Balancing Cost with Innovation
As we delve deeper into the narrative of FHIR, we arrive at the intersection of cost-efficiency and innovation. It’s a junction fraught with promise and perplexity. A most murky milieu.
The adoption of FHIR standards is often heralded for its potential to reduce healthcare costs by streamlining data exchange processes and eliminating redundancies. Yet, the initial investment required to implement these standards is not insignificant. Healthcare organizations must navigate this financial conundrum, weighing the upfront costs against the anticipated long-term savings and improvements in patient care.
The economic impact of FHIR extends beyond the ledger. It has the power to catalyze a shift in healthcare economics, driving value-based care through improved data accessibility and quality. However, the gray areas loom large. Smaller practices may find the cost of entry daunting, while larger institutions grapple with the scale of integration. The variability in resources and readiness across the healthcare spectrum adds layers of complexity to the economic equation of FHIR adoption and its feasibility to create impactful change.
How should healthcare entities budget for the transition to FHIR-compliant systems? What financial models can support the sustainable adoption of FHIR standards? How do we measure the return on investment in a field where the benefits are as much about patient outcomes as they are about financial gain? These are the gray matters to ponder while charting a course through the gray, murky waters of healthcare IT. The decisions made today will shape the economic reality of healthcare tomorrow. Thus it’s a gray matter we have to talk about today.
Anticipating the New World Order with FHIR Coming in 2027
CMS-0057-F (the Interoperability and Prior Authorization final rule) is an earthquake that will reshape the healthcare landscape. And it’s an earthquake that has barely just begun. It will hit, in full force, in 2027. And I predict that aftershocks will be felt for a decade at least.
This rule is not just another regulatory hoop to jump through; it’s a clarion call for a systemic overhaul. Those who went beyond merely “checking the box” for Patient Access understood its importance. Those who did the bare minimum should be wiser this time around. The rule demands that healthcare plans not only open the gates for data exchange but also ensure that the processes governing prior authorizations become more transparent and efficient.
The rule extends the reach of FHIR, pushing it from the realm of potential into the arena of practical utility. In a few short years, FHIR data stores will no longer be dead end streets where stale data is left to rot. Rather, FHIR capabilities will be at the center of a rich, fruitful, collaborative dialogue between disparate entities in healthcare, all trying to work together better.
As we wade through the murky waters of this new regulatory environment, questions arise:
- How will these APIs be implemented?
- What changes will healthcare entities need to make to their current systems?
- How will this shift affect the day-to-day operations of healthcare providers and the care received by patients?
- What needs to happen to ensure these changes are useful and that they persist?
Health plans are being asked to jump into a giant gray pool. This is a new frontier in data sharing, the next generation of healthcare operations. None of us have the answers. But we all have the vision. And the sooner we address this most gray of matters, the sooner we can finally get down to the business of making the world a better place.
Navigating the Gray to Illuminate the Future
In the intricate tapestry of healthcare IT, FHIR emerges as a beacon of hope, promising a future where data flows freely and informs care with precision. Yet, as we have explored, the path to this future is not illuminated by clear light but instead shrouded in shades of gray, clouded by a murky fog. It’s within this ambiguity that our collective efforts must focus, to unravel the complexities and weave a system that is both robust and flexible. It’s within this ambiguity that the magic of innovation is born.
The challenges are many – balancing privacy with progress, cost with innovation, and regulation with practicality. But these are not insurmountable. They’re the very substance of transformation, the ‘gray matter’ that, when shaped thoughtfully, can give rise to something special and new.
Let’s then move forward with cautious optimism, acknowledging the gray but not deterred by it. I’m still that same child, wishing life was binary, solvable like a video game. But at least now I have the wisdom to know that living the fullest life requires us to play in the gray.